Liquid vs. air-filled cuff during air transport

Author: Simon Franz, Reviewer: Matthias Himmelstoss, Thomas Sperling, Thomas Reimer, Joel Feindt, Bernhard Schmitt

During fixed- or rotary-wing transport, my usual practice is to inject 10 ml of saline into the cuff of the patient’s endotracheal tube to prevent over-inflation. What would be the advantage of using an air-filled cuff in combination with an automatic cuff-pressure controller in these situations?

While the ambient pressure drops with the height above sea level, a closed system such as an ETT cuff keeps its absolute pressure constant. This results in a relative pressure increase of the ETT cuff pressure compared to the environment. Many endotracheal tube (ETT) cuffs are therefore over-inflated during air transport, potentially causing pressure-related tracheal injuries. Weisberg et al. (2017) discovered that there is no linear relationship between ETT cuff pressures and maximum altitude during transports near sea level (up to an altitude of 3,000 ft). Their results support routine monitoring of ETT cuff pressures, as many cuffs were initially over-inflated. However, there appears to be no need to replace air with saline at altitudes near sea level (1).

Continuous pressure monitoring of all four cuff management techniques using the 8.0 mm ID ETT. 
The dotted red line reflects the safety threshold of 30 cmH20 cuff pressure (Britton et al., 2014).

For information about this behavior at higher altitudes, such as in the pressurized cabin of a fixed-wing airplane (8,000 ft), we can refer to the work of Britton et al. (2014). They compared four different methods of managing endotracheal cuff pressure, and evaluated the pressure at sea level (baseline) and 8,000 ft. They showed that filling the cuff with saline did not prevent the cuff pressure from increasing with higher altitudes (2). This is probably due to residual air inside the cuff. In addition, they showed that a fixed volume of saline could lead to a dangerously high level of cuff pressure even at sea level.

It is generally accepted that the potential harmful effects of a cuffed endotracheal tube are due to transmural pressures between the cuff and tracheal mucosa, which exceed the capillary perfusion pressure of the tissue. Using saline instead of air does not provide sufficient protection against these high pressures, and also affects the ability to measure the actual cuff pressure. From a pathophysiological view, it therefore makes much more sense to control the pressure rather than the volume in the cuff.

With the automatic cuff-pressure controller, IntelliCuff®, Hamilton Medical offers a solution for automatic measurement and maintainence of cuff pressure for all patient groups for critical care, interhospital transport, and anesthesia.


  1. Weisberg, S. N., McCall Jr, J. C., & Tennyson, J. (2017). Altitude-Related Change in Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Helicopter EMS. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(4), 624.
  2. Britton, T., Blakeman, T. C., Eggert, J., Rodriquez, D., Ortiz, H., & Branson, R. D. (2014). Managing endotracheal tube cuff pressure at altitude: a comparison of four methods. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 77(3), S240-S244.
cuff pressure, altitude, airplane, liquid-filled, air-filled, pressure measurement, ETT, IntelliCuff

Date of Printing: 12.07.2020
The content of this Knowledge Base is intended for informational purposes only. Hamilton Medical AG provides no warranty with respect to the information contained in this Knowledge Base and reliance on any part of this information is solely at your own risk. For detailed instructions on operating your Hamilton Medical device, please refer to the official Hamilton Medical Operator’s Manual for the respective device.