Zurück

Using one ventilator for multiple patients

Artikel

Autor: Matthias Himmelstoss

Datum: 09.04.2020

In an emergency, is it possible to connect several people to one ventilator? Using a Y-connector if necessary?

Using one ventilator for multiple patients

Ventilation safety only guaranteed with one patient per device

As a medical device manufacturer, Hamilton Medical assumes an extremely high level of responsibility for patient and user safety. Their safety can only be guaranteed when the devices are used as intended, i.e., one patient per device. Non-intended usage of our ventilators for multiple patients may lead to unpredictable complications.

Therefore, Hamilton Medical cannot recommend the use of one mechanical ventilator for multiple patients. To ensure appropriate and lung-protective ventilation, monitoring and ventilator settings need to apply for each individual patient. This is made possible by the proximal flow- and pressure-measurement technology in our devices.

Important points to note for use on multiple patients

If you use our ventilators on a patient-to-ventilator ratio of greater than 1:1, be aware that:

  1. The inability to directly measure volumes delivered to the individual lungs will most probably result in distending (and damaging) the healthier lungs of the ventilated patients, while the lower compliant lungs will collapse further.
  2. A multi-ventilator strategy will not allow for optimized CO2 clearance.
  3. The increase in artificial airways (breathing tubes) will reduce the ventilator's performance (pressures will be lost due to circuit/breathing tube compliance).
  4. The only recommendation with respect to positioning the proximal flow sensor is to put it at the Y-piece of the ventilated patient. So which patient will you choose?
  5.  Recommendations for COVID-19 and ARDS patients include tidal-volume monitoring and limitations, and individual PEEP settings: How can you make sure this works for two patients on one ventilator?
  6. Ventilating multiple patients will mean one patient’s interaction with the ventilator interferes with the ventilation of another patient.
  7. Weaning the patient from the ventilator is one of the most important ways to ensure the availability of ventilators. How can you be sure you can wean your patient with the likelihood of total asynchrony between patient and ventilator?
  8. Running two patients on one ventilator will also involve serious hygiene issues. Patients may also have additional pathogens like multi-resistant bacteria or other viruses, etc.
  9. Important procedures like prone positioning will not be possible in such a setting.

In the case of a ventilator shortage

Should you run out of ventilator equipment, we recommend instead:

  • Informing the local authorities and asking for help
  • Informing the Clinical Direction: All non-essential treatment (surgery, endoscopy, examinations, etc.) should be postponed to free up all ventilators within the hospital
  • Informing the operating-room department: Ask for anesthesia devices, transport ventilators, old ventilators in the basements and whatever works within its intended use
  • Asking hospitals in the region for help (ventilators): Local authorities may have to step in as private hospitals may not be willing to rent their ventilators
  • Asking private surgical centers for their anesthesia devices: Support from local authorities may be needed here as well
  • Trying to use NIV devices instead of invasive ventilators wherever possible (however, not on COVID-19 patients)  and getting patients weaned and extubated as soon as possible
  • Trying to reduce the number of COPD patients who have their own sleep apnea devices, but are connected to an ICU ventilator in hospital. Try to bring these patients back to a state where they can be ventilated on their own equipment

Full citations below: (Branson RD, Blakeman TC, Robinson BR, Johannigman JA. Use of a single ventilator to support 4 patients: laboratory evaluation of a limited concept. Respir Care. 2012;57(3):399-403. doi:10.4187/respcare.012361​)

Use of a single ventilator to support 4 patients: laboratory evaluation of a limited concept.

Branson RD, Blakeman TC, Robinson BR, Johannigman JA. Use of a single ventilator to support 4 patients: laboratory evaluation of a limited concept. Respir Care. 2012;57(3):399-403. doi:10.4187/respcare.01236

INTRODUCTION A mass-casualty respiratory failure event where patients exceed available ventilators has spurred several proposed solutions. One proposal is use of a single ventilator to support 4 patients. METHODS A ventilator was modified to allow attachment of 4 circuits. Each circuit was connected to one chamber of 2 dual-chambered, test lungs. The ventilator was set at a tidal volume (V(T)) of 2.0 L, respiratory frequency of 10 breaths/min, and PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O. Tests were repeated with pressure targeted breaths at 15 cm H(2)O. Airway pressure, volume, and flow were measured at each chamber. The test lungs were set to simulate 4 patients using combinations of resistance (R) and compliance (C). These included equivalent C and R, constant R and variable C, constant C and variable R, and variable C and variable R. RESULTS When R and C were equivalent the V(T) distributed to each chamber of the test lung was similar during both volume (range 428-442 mL) and pressure (range 528-544 mL) breaths. Changing C while R was constant resulted in large variations in delivered V(T) (volume range 257-621 mL, pressure range 320-762 mL). Changing R while C was constant resulted in a smaller variation in V(T) (volume range 418-460 mL, pressure range 502-554 mL) compared to only C changes. When R and C were both varied, the range of delivered V(T) in both volume (336-517 mL) and pressure (417-676 mL) breaths was greater, compared to only R changes. CONCLUSIONS Using a single ventilator to support 4 patients is an attractive concept; however, the V(T) cannot be controlled for each subject and V(T) disparity is proportional to the variability in compliance. Along with other practical limitations, these findings cannot support the use of this concept for mass-casualty respiratory failure.