Wir haben festgestellt, dass Sie unsere Website von Vereinigte Staaten aus besuchen.
Für Ihr Land (Vereinigte Staaten) gibt es eine eigene Version der Website.

Zu Vereinigte Staaten wechseln
 Verbrauchsmaterialien

NIV-Masken von Pulmodyne. Maßgeschneidert

Erwachsener mit NIV-Maske von Pulmodyne Erwachsener mit NIV-Maske von Pulmodyne

NIV-Masken von Pulmodyne. Mehr Komfort für Ihre Patienten

Die BiTrac-Masken von Pulmodyne bieten eine weiche, ergonomisch geformte Abdichtung zum Gesicht mit einem Stirnpolster, die einen bequemen und einfachen Sitz ermöglicht (Sadeghi S, Fakharian A, Nasri P, Kiani A. Comparison of Comfort and Effectiveness of Total Face Mask and Oronasal Mask in Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:2048032. doi:10.1155/2017/20480321​). Die Masken für den Einmalgebrauch bieten eine kompatible Beatmung für spontan atmende Patienten, die eine nichtinvasive Beatmung (NIV) benötigen.

Unser Portfolio an NIV-Masken

Wir bieten Masken für Pädiatrie und Erwachsene. Sie können zwischen Nasen-, Mund- und Nasen- und MaxShield-Konfigurationen wählen, die in verschiedenen Größen erhältlich sind, um eine bessere Passform für jeden Patienten zu ermöglichen.

Free e-book

Good to know! The basics of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

Get an overview of benefits and clinical relevance of noninvasive ventilation, as well as practical information about choosing the right interface, adjusting the settings, and monitoring your patients.

Comparison of Comfort and Effectiveness of Total Face Mask and Oronasal Mask in Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial.

Sadeghi S, Fakharian A, Nasri P, Kiani A. Comparison of Comfort and Effectiveness of Total Face Mask and Oronasal Mask in Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:2048032. doi:10.1155/2017/2048032

Background. There is a growing controversy about the use of oronasal masks (ONM) or total facemask (TFM) in noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), so we designed a trial to compare the uses of these two masks in terms of effectiveness and comfort. Methods. Between February and November 2014, a total of 48 patients with respiratory failure were studied. Patients were randomized to receive NPPV via ONM or TFM. Data were recorded at 60 minutes and six and 24 hours after intervention. Patient comfort was assessed using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using t-test and chi-square test. Repeated measures ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare clinical and laboratory data. Results. There were no differences in venous blood gas (VBG) values between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, at six hours, TFM was much more effective in reducing the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) (P = 0.04). Patient comfort and acceptance were statistically similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Total time of NPPV was also similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions. TFM was superior to ONM in acute phase of respiratory failure but not once the patients were out of acute phase.