We have detected that you are visiting our website from United States.
We offer a separate version of the website for your country (United States).

Switch to United States
 Consumables

NIV masks from Pulmodyne. Tailored to fit

Adult with pulmodyne NIV mask Adult with pulmodyne NIV mask

Pulmodyne NIV masks. Offering comfort to your patients

The Pulmodyne BiTrac masks offers a soft, ergonomically shaped face seal with forehead cushioning made for a comfortable and easy fit (Sadeghi S, Fakharian A, Nasri P, Kiani A. Comparison of Comfort and Effectiveness of Total Face Mask and Oronasal Mask in Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:2048032. doi:10.1155/2017/20480321​). The single patient use masks provide compatible ventilation for spontaneously breathing patients who require noninvasive ventilation (NIV).

Our NIV mask portfolio

We offer masks for both pediatric and adult patients. You can choose between nasal, full face, and MaxShield configurations available in several sizes to promote a better fit for each patient.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) e-book

Free e-book

Good to know! The basics of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

Get an overview of benefits and clinical relevance of noninvasive ventilation, as well as practical information about choosing the right interface, adjusting the settings, and monitoring your patients.

Comparison of Comfort and Effectiveness of Total Face Mask and Oronasal Mask in Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial.

Sadeghi S, Fakharian A, Nasri P, Kiani A. Comparison of Comfort and Effectiveness of Total Face Mask and Oronasal Mask in Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Clinical Trial. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:2048032. doi:10.1155/2017/2048032

Background. There is a growing controversy about the use of oronasal masks (ONM) or total facemask (TFM) in noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), so we designed a trial to compare the uses of these two masks in terms of effectiveness and comfort. Methods. Between February and November 2014, a total of 48 patients with respiratory failure were studied. Patients were randomized to receive NPPV via ONM or TFM. Data were recorded at 60 minutes and six and 24 hours after intervention. Patient comfort was assessed using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using t-test and chi-square test. Repeated measures ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare clinical and laboratory data. Results. There were no differences in venous blood gas (VBG) values between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, at six hours, TFM was much more effective in reducing the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) (P = 0.04). Patient comfort and acceptance were statistically similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Total time of NPPV was also similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions. TFM was superior to ONM in acute phase of respiratory failure but not once the patients were out of acute phase.