Session expired

Due to inactivity your session has expired. Please login again.

 技术

快速顺序插管 (RSI) 支持

从预氧合到插管

"" ""

直接进入气道。 无压力的 RSI 支持

争分夺秒之际,信心更为关键。在快速顺序插管 (RSI) 的每个阶段,HAMILTON-EM7 能够为急救医疗团队提供支持——从无创预氧合到有创机械通气。

RSI 是一种高风险、高回报的治疗程序 (Hayes-Bradley C, McCreery M, Delorenzo A, Bendall J, Lewis A, Bowles KA.Predictive and protective factors for failing first pass intubation in prehospital rapid sequence intubation: an aetiology and risk systematic review with meta-analysis.Br J Anaesth.2024;132(5):918-935. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.0041​)。HAMILTON-EM7 有可能降低复杂性,并通过内置 RSI 工作流程为您提供支持,该流程能够自动执行关键步骤并最大限度地减少延迟 (Hayes-Bradley C, McCreery M, Delorenzo A, Bendall J, Lewis A, Bowles KA.Predictive and protective factors for failing first pass intubation in prehospital rapid sequence intubation: an aetiology and risk systematic review with meta-analysis.Br J Anaesth.2024;132(5):918-935. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.0041​)。

RSI 在院前护理中的益处

可用性

RSI 作为所有 HAMILTON-EM7 呼吸机上的标准功能提供。

Predictive and protective factors for failing first pass intubation in prehospital rapid sequence intubation: an aetiology and risk systematic review with meta-analysis.

Hayes-Bradley C, McCreery M, Delorenzo A, Bendall J, Lewis A, Bowles KA. Predictive and protective factors for failing first pass intubation in prehospital rapid sequence intubation: an aetiology and risk systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2024;132(5):918-935. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.004

BACKGROUND Prehospital rapid sequence intubation first pass success rates vary between 59% and 98%. Patient morbidity is associated with repeat intubation attempts. Understanding what influences first pass success can guide improvements in practice. We performed an aetiology and risk systematic review to answer the research question 'what factors are associated with success or failure at first attempt laryngoscopy in prehospital rapid sequence intubation?'. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on March 3, 2023 for studies examining first pass success rates for rapid sequence intubation of prehospital live patients. Screening was performed via Covidence, and data synthesised by meta-analysis. The review was registered with PROSPERO and performed and reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS Reasonable evidence was discovered for predictive and protective factors for failure of first pass intubation. Predictive factors included age younger than 1 yr, the presence of blood or fluid in the airway, restricted jaw or neck movement, trauma patients, nighttime procedures, chronic or acute distortions of normal face/upper airway anatomy, and equipment issues. Protective factors included an experienced intubator, adequate training, use of certain videolaryngoscopes, elevating the patient on a stretcher in an inclined position, use of a bougie, and laryngeal manoeuvres. CONCLUSIONS Managing bloody airways, positioning well, using videolaryngoscopes with bougies, and appropriate training should be further explored as opportunities for prehospital services to increase first pass success. Heterogeneity of studies limits stronger conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL PROSPERO (CRD42022353609).